Friday, June 29, 2012

Paris: Vice and Entrapment



            In The Flowers of Evil, Baudelaire describes a Paris causing its population to rot both physically and morally. Specifically, two of the chapters in The Flowers of Evil, “Paris Spleen” and “Parisian Scenes”, deconstruct humans into skeletal automatons and majestic urban spaces into dilapidated squalor. He attributes this decay to an almost vindictive feeling of ennui that desensitizes the city’s populace to the moral degeneration flourishing amongst the ruins of a once great city. Differently put, Baudelaire feels the city is a caustic environment that slowly liquefies our bodies into a faceless mass of humanity while at the same time eroding our moral credos into a universal sense of debauchery.
            The interaction between the environment and one’s self is of paramount importance to Baudelaire. His city affects its citizens to such a degree that it gains an aspect of control over their perception of their world and influences their moral decisions. In his poem “Correspondences”, Baudelaire intertwines every sensual effect of the environment into a single interaction with the viewer:
“As the long echoes, shadowy, profound,
Heard from afar, blend in a unity,
Vast as the night, as sunlight’s clarity,
So perfumes, colors may correspond.”[1]

The poem’s title suggests that we are in perpetual dialogue, or correspondence, with our surroundings. This potent conversation is a crucial element in his later poems and serves as the crux of his investigation of how people undergo a polar shift of morality and physically erode by simply moving to the city.
Uncertainty and confusion are two of the most affecting attributes of Baudelaire’s Paris. In “Paris Spleen” and “Parisian Scenes”, he blurs the lines between reality and fantasy, distorts the boundaries of night and day, and even fails to distinguish between the living and the dead. The frustration associated with this occlusion of reality allows Paris’ citizens to morally validate their malaise and thus seek visceral remedies. One can argue that “Spleen” defines the environment while “Parisian Scenes” portrays its effect.  Specifically, the themes of skeletons and lost souls aimlessly wondering through fog and drizzle permeate the poem.  Baudelaire provides a palpable description of the city by stating:
“When earth is changed into a sweaty cell,
In which Hope, captured, like a frantic bat,
Batters the walls with her enfeebled wing,
Striking her head against the rotting beams;

When steady rain trailing its giant train
Descends on us like heavy prison bars,
And when a silent multitude of spiders
Spins its disgusting threads deep in our brains,

Bells all at once jump out with all their force,
And hurl about a mad cacophony
As if they were those lost and homeless souls
Who send dogged whining to the skies.”[2]
In a mere three verses, Baudelaire transforms Paris into a crowded, dank, and sweaty prison of souls aimlessly lamenting in the black emptiness of oblivion. Also, he maintains his motif of confusion by both afflicting these lost spirits with both stifling heat and freezing rain. This bewilderment entraps and facilitates the delivery of the poem’s quintessential allusion: the transformation of Hope into a bat, a creature that dwells in subterranean darkness, and then condemns the animal to strike her head upon a rotting landscape.
            Baudelaire describes humanity’s reaction to the city in two distinct responses: a frustrating feeling of entrapment and a violet hour in which morality becomes a polar inverse of its previous self. With respect to gaining a firm understanding of our environment and clearly defining a proper interaction, Baudelaire unequivocally dismisses the possibility of such reconciliation. In fact, he believes that the city changes from an inorganic landscape to a self-realized entity capable of rearanging its form in accordance with its own designs thus preventing humanity from gaining a higher degree of understanding beyond an evanescent visual response to very temporary physical surroundings. In his poem “The Blind”, Baudelaire describes people as “peculiar, terrible somnambulists”[3] groping their way along the streets and alleyways in a dreamy malaise while the city mockingly rearranges itself thus trapping them in an unending maze. Baudelaire explains:
“Thus they traverse the blackness of their days,
Kin to the silence of eternity.
O city! While you laugh and roar and play,
Mad with your lusts to the point of cruelty,
Look at me! Dragging, dazed more than their kind.
What in the Skies can these men hope to find?”[4]

            He goes further to identify another form of entrapment: the relegation of all common citizens into one faceless and uniform social class. Baudelaire feels the irreconcilable difference between our desire for familiarity and the city’s perpetual metamorphosis denies the possible of establishing a sense of individuality. Differently stated, if we are unable to define our surroundings, we can never come to understand ourselves. In “The Little Old Women”, Baudelaire observes a parade of old, broken women so transformed by the city that they all appear to be the same person. The virtuous slowly become profane while strong get week. Eventually, all that remains is a degenerate crowd of cattle. Baudelaire recognizes their devolution by stating:
“ So you trudge on, stoic, without complaint,
Through the chaotic city’s teeming waste,
Saints, courtesans, mothers of bleeding hearts,
Whose names in times past, everyone had known.

You glorious ones, you who were full of grace,
No one remembers you! “[5]

Clearly, Baudelaire’s city compresses its citizens into one uniform, faceless mass blindly attempting to navigate along streets that constantly rearranged themselves at the will of the city. Understandably, this sense of entrapment justifies a reaction that Baudelaire finds absolutely delicious. He feels that once we assume our place in the pulsating mass of the crowd, we abandon all moral codes.
            “Dusk” describes the violet hour between an understanding of the world based upon diligent hard work and that of a realm filled with “corrupting demons of the air slowly [waking] up men of great affairs”[6]. In this ethereal world, the city transforms from an industrious realm of hardworking people laying their weary heads upon their pillows to a realm limned by streets full of prostitutes and other denizens of immorality. Let us further define this transition by comparing an excerpt from the early portion of the poem to one following the world’s moral evolution. Prior to transferring control to the forces of vice, Baudelaire describes Paris as a place where:
“Honest, weary arms can say: We’ve done
Our work today! The night will bring relief
To spirits who consume themselves with grief,
The scholar who is bowed with heavy head,
The broken worker falling into bed.”[7]

However, instead of providing a restful nights sleep to those who toil in the hot sun, the city elects to become a buzzing hive of malevolent activity. As dark falls, we witness the conception of such a scene:
“The tables at the inns where gamesmen sport
Are full of swindlers, sluts, and all their sort.
Robbers who show no pity to their prey
Get ready for their nightly work-a-day
Of cracking safes and deftly forcing doors,
To live a few more days and dress their whores.”[8]

This juxtaposition demonstrates the moral decline facilitated by the palpable angst of Paris’ citizens. Each day, they toil until they are exhausted and look forward to getting a good night’s sleep. However, the cacophony of vice wrenches them from their sleep each night. This cycle continues until resolves are broken and moralities are abandoned. Simply put, Baudelaire feels that prolonged exposure to the city’s debauchery eventually breaks the resistance of every occupant.
Baudelaire’s Paris strips humanity of all individuality and morality by physically entrapping it in a constantly evolving environment and making it wade through a sea of vice on a daily basis.  He feels that the will and moral code of the city is vastly superior to that of our own. It is as if the city is changing so rapidly, it must ensure its population is complicit and unwilling to impede its evolution. In order to ensure humanity’s obedience, the city rewards us with treats of sex, alcohol, gambling and other sensual delights. Similar to his sentiments regarding beauty in “The Painter of Modern Life”, Baudelaire feels we don’t have a choice regarding this submission. It does not matter how strong our bodies and morals are. The city will always be stronger.


[1] Charles Baudelaire, “Correspondences” in The Flowers of Evil, trans. James McGowan (New York: Oxford University Press), 29.
[2] Charles Baudelaire, “Spleen (IV)” in The Flowers of Evil, trans. James McGowan (New York: Oxford University Press), 149.
[3] Charles Baudelaire, “The Blind” in The Flowers of Evil, trans. James McGowan (New York: Oxford University Press), 187.
[4] Ibid, 187-188.
[5] Charles Baudelaire, “The Little Old Women” in The Flowers of Evil, trans. James McGowan (New York: Oxford University Press), 185.
[6] Charles Baudelaire, “Dusk” in The Flowers of Evil, trans. James McGowan (New York: Oxford University Press), 193.
[7] Ibid, 193.
[8] Ibid, 193.

Friday, June 22, 2012

"I Know My Museum"


            Charles Baudelaire believes the folly of going to the Louvre, walking past secondary works of art, stopping abruptly in front of a Titian or Raphael, and then confidently stating, “I know my museum,”[1] is identical to deeming art portraying only a city’s picturesque tableaus as a thorough representation of the modern urban space. Baudelaire feels beauty consists of two distinct factors: one resembling a Kantian a priori element of eternal invariability while the other is a relative, flexible piece susceptible to contemporary influences such as fashion and emotions. These two unique constructs create a sense beauty defined by Baudelaire as the “promise of happiness”[2]. Furthermore, his concept of beauty uniquely intertwines flavors of what some readers refer to as the vulgar and provocative. Regardless of moral judgment levied by external agencies, Baudelaire feels that “the obscene” is such a prevalent theme within the modern urban space that omitting its portrayal is to deny the second component of his model of beauty. In other words, Baudelaire calls upon the reader to search for a beautiful sense of vulgarity to fully comprehend the modern aesthetic.
             To further his argument, Baudelaire constructs a dichotomy between a “man of the world” and an artist to contrast the unadulterated portrayal of an environment to that of one obfuscated by subjective moral censorship. Baudelaire defines a man of the world as one who “understands the world and the mysterious and lawful reasons for all its uses” while artists are nothing but “highly skilled animals, pure artisans, village intellectuals, [and] cottage brains”[3]. What segregates the two is the notion that a man of world is not afraid to embrace the unfamiliar and uncomfortable while artists avoid leaving familiar neighborhoods.  By exposing ourselves to the foreign, we become vulnerable to a “violent nervous shock that has its repercussion in the very core of the brain”[4] which in turn couple with the aforementioned a priori component of beauty. The result is art with an unequivocal presence of both purity and clarity.
            To validate his theory, Baudelaire exhumes the beauty prevalent in a common prostitute. To him, the motifs of lust, excess, and degeneration blend together in a “background of hellish light…or if you prefer an aurora borealis” that enables a prostitute to arise as a “Protean image of wanton beauty”[5]. While a puritanical reaction quickly relegates this Jezebel to realm of sin and damnation, Baudelaire gleans a unique thread of beauty composing the modern aesthetic. This liminal figure treading on the fringes of society possess a sense of beauty “which comes to her from Evil always devoid of spirituality, but sometimes tinged with a weariness which imitates true melancholy”[6]. Furthermore, her willingness to become a public spectacle, or a “creature of show, an object of public pleasure”[7] only compounds her appeal. Paradoxically, her propensity to defile herself makes her unique, and to Baudelaire, very beautiful.
            Transitioning to his essay “Some French Caricaturists”, Baudelaire buttresses “The Painter of Modern Life” by introducing an additional artistic theme: caricature. When artists draw caricatures, they gain the freedom to exaggerate natural defects and thus gain access to higher level of lucidity while portraying a “great city [which] contains living monstrosities, in all their fantastic and thrilling reality”[8]. Artists such as Charlet, Daumier, and Goya use caricatures to deconstruct a divinity superimposed by either political agendas or an evanescent contemporary aesthetic and address the banality, if not absurdity, of the modern world. Goya’s ugly portrayal of monks creates an “art that purifies like fire”[9] while Daumier’s art boldly showcases the “ridiculous troubles of home, every little stupidity, every little pride, every enthusiasm, every despair of the bourgeois”[10]. Their accurate and honest exposé of modern life introduces a sense of malaise and despair that Baudelaire considers “a very amusing bit of blasphemy”[11] that allows us to pierce the artificial grandeur dictated to us by external agents and regain the faith in our own ability to define reality.
            “The Painter of Modern Life” and “Some French Caricaturists” introduce an aesthetic derived from combining the decay and degradation of the modern city with our a priori notion of the beautiful. This synthesis deconstructs the classical notion of beauty and forces us to find splendor in the perverse and vulgar. Revisiting the notion of sprinting through the Louvre to behold Raphael’s work, Baudelaire challenges us to pause and embrace the beauty of our decrepit surroundings. While some of us are averse to sorting through refuse in a search for beautiful, Baudelaire argues that in the modern world, we do not have an alternative. As he previously stated, beauty is one of the few promises of happiness granted to us by the modern world.
             


[1] Charles Baudelaire, “The Painter of Modern Life” in The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays, trans. Jonathan Mayne (New York: Phaidon Press), 1.
[2] Ibid, 3.
[3] Ibid, 7.
[4] Ibid, 8.
[5] Ibid, 36.
[6] Ibid, 36.
[7] Ibid, 36.
[8] Charles Baudelaire, “Some French Caricaturists” in The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays, trans. Jonathan Mayne (New York: Phaidon Press), 177.
[9] Ibid, 169.
[10] Ibid, 177.
[11] Ibid, 179.